Ugandan vs Indian (Asian) Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Ugandan
Indian (Asian)
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Ugandans
Indians (Asian)
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
49.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
71.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Indian (Asian) Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,993,745 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 27.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,524,246 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.53%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 16.6% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 47.7% | 55.9% |
Range | 31.1% | 44.9% |
Mean | 28.4% | 27.7% |
Median | 27.1% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.7% | 25.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.6% | 29.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Indians (Asian) by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from China (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Argentina (27.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Israeli (27.5%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |