Immigrants from Moldova vs Ute Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Moldova
Ute
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Moldova
Ute
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
65.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Moldova vs Ute Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,364,803 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,658,478 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 64.3%, a difference of 0.15%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Moldova | Ute |
| Minimum | 36.9% | 32.4% |
| Maximum | 83.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 46.5% | 67.6% |
| Mean | 64.5% | 69.2% |
| Median | 64.8% | 70.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.9% | 59.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.1% | 78.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 19.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 15.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova and Ute by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are German (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Lebanese (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Uruguayan (64.5%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Dutch West Indian (64.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Armenian (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (64.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |
| Ute | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 64.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 64.3% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 52.5 /100 | #173 | Average 64.3% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 64.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 44.3 /100 | #175 | Average 64.3% |