European vs Swiss Kindergarten
COMPARE
European
Swiss
Kindergarten
Kindergarten Comparison
Europeans
Swiss
98.6%
KINDERGARTEN
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.5%
KINDERGARTEN
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Swiss Kindergarten Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,829,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of population with at least kindergarten education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 98.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,023,158 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with at least kindergarten education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.456 and weighted average of 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%.
Kindergarten Correlation Summary
Measurement | European | Swiss |
Minimum | 93.6% | 95.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 6.4% | 4.1% |
Mean | 99.4% | 99.2% |
Median | 99.8% | 99.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 99.0% | 98.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.92% | 0.88% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.92% | 0.88% |
Demographics Similar to Europeans and Swiss by Kindergarten
In terms of kindergarten, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are French (98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Czech (98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (98.6%, a difference of 0.010%), French Canadian (98.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and Scandinavian (98.6%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Chinese (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), French Canadian (98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Scandinavian (98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), British (98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and French (98.6%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Kindergarten |
Finns | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Sioux | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 98.6% |
French | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 98.6% |
French Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 98.5% |
British | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 98.5% |