South African vs Brazilian Disability
COMPARE
South African
Brazilian
Disability
Disability Comparison
South Africans
Brazilians
11.4%
DISABILITY
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
DISABILITY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Brazilian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,593,286 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,954,129 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.17%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Brazilian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 23.5% |
Range | 42.0% | 21.8% |
Mean | 12.9% | 11.9% |
Median | 11.1% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Brazilians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are South American Indian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Central American (11.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Korean (11.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Luxembourger (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 94.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Guyanese | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 94.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Luxembourgers | 93.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% |