Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Zimbabwean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Zimbabweans
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,541,023 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 41.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 6.9% |
Range | 51.1% | 5.9% |
Mean | 10.6% | 3.4% |
Median | 7.7% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 4.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Venezuelan (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from South America (5.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |