Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tacoma
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma

98.9%
17.2%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 98443 17.2% 36.2% (-19.0)#137 35.2% (-18.0)#10,140
2. 98422 21.7% 36.2% (-14.5)#198 35.2% (-13.4)#14,509
3. 98446 28.3% 36.2% (-7.93)#290 35.2% (-6.89)#19,927
4. 98445 29.0% 36.2% (-7.20)#302 35.2% (-6.17)#20,416
5. 98404 32.8% 36.2% (-3.37)#355 35.2% (-2.34)#22,692
6. 98408 33.5% 36.2% (-2.74)#365 35.2% (-1.71)#23,034
7. 98418 34.0% 36.2% (-2.22)#371 35.2% (-1.18)#23,255
8. 98407 34.7% 36.2% (-1.49)#381 35.2% (-0.454)#23,617
9. 98406 35.0% 36.2% (-1.17)#385 35.2% (-0.141)#23,765
10. 98466 45.3% 36.2% (+9.06)#468 35.2% (+10.1)#27,110
11. 98465 47.3% 36.2% (+11.1)#479 35.2% (+12.1)#27,513
12. 98405 49.3% 36.2% (+13.0)#490 35.2% (+14.1)#27,888
13. 98444 55.5% 36.2% (+19.3)#511 35.2% (+20.3)#28,834
14. 98409 56.1% 36.2% (+19.9)#513 35.2% (+20.9)#28,907
15. 98403 58.7% 36.2% (+22.5)#519 35.2% (+23.5)#29,183
16. 98402 77.8% 36.2% (+41.6)#542 35.2% (+42.7)#30,356
17. 98421 89.1% 36.2% (+52.9)#546 35.2% (+53.9)#30,612
18. 98433 98.9% 36.2% (+62.7)#549 35.2% (+63.8)#30,771

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA are:
#1
17.2%
#2
21.7%
#3
28.3%
#4
29.0%
#5
32.8%
#6
33.5%
#7
34.0%
#8
34.7%
#9
35.0%
#10
45.3%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA?
98443 has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA with 17.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma is 43.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Washington?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Washington is 36.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.