Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tacoma
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma

17.2%
98.9%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 98433 98.9% 36.2% (+62.7)#11 35.2% (+63.8)#331
2. 98421 89.1% 36.2% (+52.9)#14 35.2% (+53.9)#490
3. 98402 77.8% 36.2% (+41.6)#18 35.2% (+42.7)#746
4. 98403 58.7% 36.2% (+22.5)#41 35.2% (+23.5)#1,919
5. 98409 56.1% 36.2% (+19.9)#47 35.2% (+20.9)#2,195
6. 98444 55.5% 36.2% (+19.3)#49 35.2% (+20.3)#2,268
7. 98405 49.3% 36.2% (+13.0)#70 35.2% (+14.1)#3,214
8. 98465 47.3% 36.2% (+11.1)#81 35.2% (+12.1)#3,589
9. 98466 45.3% 36.2% (+9.06)#92 35.2% (+10.1)#3,992
10. 98406 35.0% 36.2% (-1.17)#175 35.2% (-0.141)#7,337
11. 98407 34.7% 36.2% (-1.49)#179 35.2% (-0.454)#7,485
12. 98418 34.0% 36.2% (-2.22)#189 35.2% (-1.18)#7,847
13. 98408 33.5% 36.2% (-2.74)#195 35.2% (-1.71)#8,068
14. 98404 32.8% 36.2% (-3.37)#205 35.2% (-2.34)#8,410
15. 98445 29.0% 36.2% (-7.20)#258 35.2% (-6.17)#10,686
16. 98446 28.3% 36.2% (-7.93)#270 35.2% (-6.89)#11,175
17. 98422 21.7% 36.2% (-14.5)#362 35.2% (-13.4)#16,593
18. 98443 17.2% 36.2% (-19.0)#423 35.2% (-18.0)#20,962

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA are:
#1
98.9%
#2
89.1%
#3
77.8%
#4
58.7%
#5
56.1%
#6
55.5%
#7
49.3%
#8
47.3%
#9
45.3%
#10
35.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA?
98433 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA with 98.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma is 43.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Washington?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Washington is 36.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.