Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tacoma
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1.9843398.9%36.2%(+62.7)#1135.2%(+63.8)#331
2.9842189.1%36.2%(+52.9)#1435.2%(+53.9)#490
3.9840277.8%36.2%(+41.6)#1835.2%(+42.7)#746
4.9840358.7%36.2%(+22.5)#4135.2%(+23.5)#1,919
5.9840956.1%36.2%(+19.9)#4735.2%(+20.9)#2,195
6.9844455.5%36.2%(+19.3)#4935.2%(+20.3)#2,268
7.9840549.3%36.2%(+13.0)#7035.2%(+14.1)#3,214
8.9846547.3%36.2%(+11.1)#8135.2%(+12.1)#3,589
9.9846645.3%36.2%(+9.06)#9235.2%(+10.1)#3,992
10.9840635.0%36.2%(-1.17)#17535.2%(-0.141)#7,337
11.9840734.7%36.2%(-1.49)#17935.2%(-0.454)#7,485
12.9841834.0%36.2%(-2.22)#18935.2%(-1.18)#7,847
13.9840833.5%36.2%(-2.74)#19535.2%(-1.71)#8,068
14.9840432.8%36.2%(-3.37)#20535.2%(-2.34)#8,410
15.9844529.0%36.2%(-7.20)#25835.2%(-6.17)#10,686
16.9844628.3%36.2%(-7.93)#27035.2%(-6.89)#11,175
17.9842221.7%36.2%(-14.5)#36235.2%(-13.4)#16,593
18.9844317.2%36.2%(-19.0)#42335.2%(-18.0)#20,962

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA are:
#1
98.9%
#2
89.1%
#3
77.8%
#4
58.7%
#5
56.1%
#6
55.5%
#7
49.3%
#8
47.3%
#9
45.3%
#10
35.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA?
98433 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA with 98.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma, WA?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tacoma is 43.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Washington?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Washington is 36.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.