New Zealander vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Chickasaw
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,893,684 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 24.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 35.3% | 38.6% |
Range | 33.4% | 36.7% |
Mean | 11.5% | 18.1% |
Median | 9.6% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |