Immigrants from Philippines vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Philippines
Chickasaw
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,914,700 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 31.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.57% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 19.7% | 38.6% |
Range | 19.2% | 36.7% |
Mean | 10.4% | 18.1% |
Median | 11.0% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |