French American Indian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Chickasaw
15.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,968,938 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 5.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.16% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 40.0% | 38.6% |
Range | 39.8% | 36.7% |
Mean | 17.2% | 18.1% |
Median | 16.2% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to French American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cree (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and Immigrants from Laos (15.0%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |