Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chickasaw
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,202,367 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.256 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 7.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 5.3% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 38.6% |
Range | 40.2% | 36.7% |
Mean | 17.3% | 18.1% |
Median | 15.1% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Osage (14.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Fijian (14.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |