Peruvian vs South African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Peruvian
South African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Peruvians
South Africans
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Peruvian vs South African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,941,638 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,540,648 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.71%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Peruvian | South African |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 40.9% | 44.9% |
| Range | 40.7% | 42.4% |
| Mean | 14.1% | 10.8% |
| Median | 12.5% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Peruvians and South Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are French (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |