Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Chickasaw
16.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,545,805 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 3.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 39.9% | 38.6% |
| Range | 37.8% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 18.1% |
| Median | 14.2% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.6% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Blackfeet (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Belize (16.3%, a difference of 0.75%), Inupiat (16.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |