Immigrants from Western Europe vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Europe
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Western Europe
Chickasaw
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Europe vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,604,679 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 23.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Europe | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.0% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 75.4% | 38.6% |
Range | 71.4% | 36.7% |
Mean | 19.6% | 18.1% |
Median | 16.1% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.5% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Europe by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Europe are Immigrants from Jordan (12.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Argentina (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and French (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |