Irish vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Irish
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Irish
Chickasaw
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,836,064 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 28.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Irish | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 38.6% |
| Range | 97.7% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 18.1% |
| Median | 12.6% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.9% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |