Chilean vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Chickasaw
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
84.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,534,344 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 23.1%.
![Chilean vs Chickasaw Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/chileans-vs-chickasaw-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 25.4% | 38.6% |
Range | 22.9% | 36.7% |
Mean | 11.0% | 18.1% |
Median | 11.6% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), French (12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |