Immigrants from Canada vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Canada
Chickasaw
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 458,964,153 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 29.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Canada | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 38.6% |
Range | 96.5% | 36.7% |
Mean | 26.2% | 18.1% |
Median | 16.9% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.2% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |