Immigrants from Singapore vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Singapore
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Singapore
Chickasaw
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Singapore vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,378,092 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 34.8%.
![Immigrants from Singapore vs Chickasaw Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/immigrants-from-singapore-vs-chickasaw-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Singapore | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.53% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 26.0% | 38.6% |
Range | 25.5% | 36.7% |
Mean | 10.7% | 18.1% |
Median | 10.3% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Singapore by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Iran (11.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (11.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |