Afghan vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Afghan
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Afghans
Chickasaw
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,814,784 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 22.0%.
![Afghan vs Chickasaw Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/afghans-vs-chickasaw-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Afghan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.3% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 31.3% | 38.6% |
Range | 27.0% | 36.7% |
Mean | 13.2% | 18.1% |
Median | 11.6% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |