Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chickasaw
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,185,827 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 29.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 21.7% | 38.6% |
Range | 19.5% | 36.7% |
Mean | 10.3% | 18.1% |
Median | 9.7% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |