French American Indian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Chickasaw
24.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,011,978 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 24.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 7.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 16.7% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 83.3% | 88.9% |
Mean | 41.9% | 35.8% |
Median | 36.2% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.5% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.8% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to French American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are American (24.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Osage (24.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and African (24.8%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |