Immigrants from Belarus vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Alaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Alaskan Athabascans
65.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
66.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,205,158 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 65.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.70%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 39.1% | 23.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.9% | 76.4% |
Mean | 63.8% | 61.3% |
Median | 64.5% | 64.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.4% | 51.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.8% | 70.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 15.6% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Western Asia (65.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (65.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Serbian (65.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Danish (65.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Arab (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | South Africa | 73.5 /100 | #160 | Good 65.3% |
Australians | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 65.3% |
Albanians | 70.8 /100 | #162 | Good 65.3% |
South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #163 | Good 65.3% |
Danes | 68.8 /100 | #164 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 68.1 /100 | #165 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 67.3 /100 | #166 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 66.0 /100 | #167 | Good 65.2% |
Serbians | 63.5 /100 | #168 | Good 65.2% |
Arabs | 62.4 /100 | #169 | Good 65.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 61.7 /100 | #170 | Good 65.2% |
Israelis | 61.6 /100 | #171 | Good 65.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 61.3 /100 | #172 | Good 65.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 53.7 /100 | #173 | Average 65.1% |
Macedonians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 65.1% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |