Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Kidder100.0%5.1%(+94.9)#15.0%(+95.0)#32
2.Farmer77.8%5.1%(+72.7)#25.0%(+72.8)#53
3.Onaka75.0%5.1%(+69.9)#35.0%(+70.0)#57
4.Vilas75.0%5.1%(+69.9)#45.0%(+70.0)#58
5.Vivian62.1%5.1%(+56.9)#55.0%(+57.1)#87
6.Long Lake55.6%5.1%(+50.4)#65.0%(+50.6)#124
7.White Horse53.8%5.1%(+48.7)#75.0%(+48.9)#134
8.Bancroft38.9%5.1%(+33.8)#85.0%(+33.9)#299
9.Central City33.3%5.1%(+28.2)#95.0%(+28.3)#417
10.Valley Springs30.0%5.1%(+24.9)#105.0%(+25.0)#546
11.Wonderland Homes29.6%5.1%(+24.4)#115.0%(+24.6)#563
12.Running Water28.0%5.1%(+22.9)#125.0%(+23.0)#643
13.Lake City27.3%5.1%(+22.1)#135.0%(+22.3)#692
14.Fedora27.3%5.1%(+22.1)#145.0%(+22.3)#694
15.Lane26.7%5.1%(+21.5)#155.0%(+21.7)#740
16.Wasta25.8%5.1%(+20.7)#165.0%(+20.8)#781
17.Draper25.0%5.1%(+19.9)#175.0%(+20.0)#851
18.Stockholm24.3%5.1%(+19.2)#185.0%(+19.3)#892
19.Marty24.1%5.1%(+19.0)#195.0%(+19.1)#905
20.Richland22.9%5.1%(+17.8)#205.0%(+17.9)#1,026
21.Bath Corner22.2%5.1%(+17.1)#215.0%(+17.2)#1,107
22.Forestburg22.2%5.1%(+17.1)#225.0%(+17.2)#1,110
23.Roscoe21.8%5.1%(+16.7)#235.0%(+16.9)#1,147
24.Frankfort21.1%5.1%(+15.9)#245.0%(+16.1)#1,232
25.Glenham20.9%5.1%(+15.8)#255.0%(+15.9)#1,256
26.Bryant19.8%5.1%(+14.6)#265.0%(+14.8)#1,404
27.Kennebec19.6%5.1%(+14.5)#275.0%(+14.6)#1,433
28.Brentford19.5%5.1%(+14.4)#285.0%(+14.5)#1,449
29.La Bolt19.0%5.1%(+13.9)#295.0%(+14.1)#1,528
30.Frederick18.9%5.1%(+13.7)#305.0%(+13.9)#1,554
31.Orient18.2%5.1%(+13.1)#315.0%(+13.2)#1,698
32.Buffalo18.1%5.1%(+13.0)#325.0%(+13.1)#1,708
33.Reliance17.9%5.1%(+12.8)#335.0%(+13.0)#1,753
34.Fairburn17.6%5.1%(+12.5)#345.0%(+12.7)#1,820
35.Columbia17.5%5.1%(+12.4)#355.0%(+12.5)#1,834
36.Fulton17.5%5.1%(+12.4)#365.0%(+12.5)#1,841
37.Avon17.2%5.1%(+12.1)#375.0%(+12.2)#1,905
38.Olivet17.1%5.1%(+12.0)#385.0%(+12.1)#1,928
39.Fruitdale17.1%5.1%(+11.9)#395.0%(+12.1)#1,947
40.Deadwood17.0%5.1%(+11.9)#405.0%(+12.0)#1,957
41.Angostura16.7%5.1%(+11.5)#415.0%(+11.7)#2,053
42.Morristown16.2%5.1%(+11.1)#425.0%(+11.2)#2,180
43.Gary16.1%5.1%(+11.0)#435.0%(+11.1)#2,196
44.Utica16.1%5.1%(+11.0)#445.0%(+11.1)#2,203
45.White River15.8%5.1%(+10.6)#455.0%(+10.8)#2,318
46.Faulkton15.2%5.1%(+10.0)#465.0%(+10.2)#2,495
47.Burke15.1%5.1%(+10.0)#475.0%(+10.1)#2,507
48.Egan14.9%5.1%(+9.73)#485.0%(+9.86)#2,601
49.Herrick14.8%5.1%(+9.69)#495.0%(+9.82)#2,627
50.Westport14.7%5.1%(+9.58)#505.0%(+9.71)#2,669
51.Hayti14.3%5.1%(+9.16)#515.0%(+9.29)#2,799
52.Chester14.3%5.1%(+9.16)#525.0%(+9.29)#2,807
53.Altamont14.3%5.1%(+9.16)#535.0%(+9.29)#2,827
54.Colman14.0%5.1%(+8.88)#545.0%(+9.01)#2,921
55.Grenville14.0%5.1%(+8.83)#555.0%(+8.96)#2,943
56.Stratford13.5%5.1%(+8.39)#565.0%(+8.52)#3,140
57.Leola13.4%5.1%(+8.31)#575.0%(+8.44)#3,176
58.New Underwood13.2%5.1%(+8.08)#585.0%(+8.21)#3,277
59.Millerdale Colony12.5%5.1%(+7.38)#595.0%(+7.51)#3,643
60.Kadoka12.3%5.1%(+7.21)#605.0%(+7.33)#3,734
61.Milbank12.3%5.1%(+7.20)#615.0%(+7.33)#3,738
62.Willow Lake12.3%5.1%(+7.16)#625.0%(+7.29)#3,765
63.Emery12.0%5.1%(+6.88)#635.0%(+7.01)#3,915
64.Lake Poinsett11.9%5.1%(+6.81)#645.0%(+6.94)#3,968
65.Claire City11.8%5.1%(+6.64)#655.0%(+6.77)#4,095
66.Ortley11.8%5.1%(+6.64)#665.0%(+6.77)#4,101
67.Wolsey11.7%5.1%(+6.62)#675.0%(+6.75)#4,112
68.Agar11.5%5.1%(+6.42)#685.0%(+6.54)#4,247
69.Glendale Colony11.3%5.1%(+6.13)#695.0%(+6.26)#4,459
70.Irene11.2%5.1%(+6.07)#705.0%(+6.20)#4,491
71.Hermosa11.2%5.1%(+6.05)#715.0%(+6.18)#4,519
72.Mountain Plains11.1%5.1%(+5.96)#725.0%(+6.08)#4,618
73.Redfield10.9%5.1%(+5.78)#735.0%(+5.91)#4,739
74.Trent10.8%5.1%(+5.72)#745.0%(+5.85)#4,786
75.Sturgis10.8%5.1%(+5.69)#755.0%(+5.82)#4,805
76.Antelope10.7%5.1%(+5.59)#765.0%(+5.72)#4,889
77.Pringle10.5%5.1%(+5.36)#775.0%(+5.49)#5,090
78.Ethan10.4%5.1%(+5.24)#785.0%(+5.37)#5,189
79.Badger10.3%5.1%(+5.13)#795.0%(+5.26)#5,307
80.Fort Pierre10.1%5.1%(+5.02)#805.0%(+5.15)#5,397
81.Fort Thompson10.1%5.1%(+4.97)#815.0%(+5.09)#5,452
82.Agency Village10.0%5.1%(+4.90)#825.0%(+5.03)#5,515
83.Piedmont10.0%5.1%(+4.89)#835.0%(+5.02)#5,519
84.Lake Andes10.0%5.1%(+4.88)#845.0%(+5.01)#5,527
85.Astoria10.0%5.1%(+4.88)#855.0%(+5.01)#5,557
86.Erwin10.0%5.1%(+4.88)#865.0%(+5.01)#5,578
87.Newell9.9%5.1%(+4.77)#875.0%(+4.90)#5,669
88.Lake Preston9.9%5.1%(+4.76)#885.0%(+4.89)#5,680
89.Big Stone City9.7%5.1%(+4.62)#895.0%(+4.75)#5,818
90.Bridgewater9.7%5.1%(+4.55)#905.0%(+4.68)#5,875
91.Quinn9.7%5.1%(+4.55)#915.0%(+4.68)#5,884
92.Nisland9.5%5.1%(+4.40)#925.0%(+4.53)#6,046
93.Bruce9.4%5.1%(+4.33)#935.0%(+4.45)#6,125
94.Dell Rapids9.4%5.1%(+4.25)#945.0%(+4.37)#6,203
95.Beresford9.4%5.1%(+4.24)#955.0%(+4.37)#6,204
96.Whitewood9.3%5.1%(+4.21)#965.0%(+4.34)#6,243
97.Doland9.3%5.1%(+4.21)#975.0%(+4.34)#6,245
98.Alexandria9.3%5.1%(+4.16)#985.0%(+4.29)#6,308
99.Lennox9.3%5.1%(+4.16)#995.0%(+4.29)#6,312
100.Dante9.2%5.1%(+4.11)#1005.0%(+4.24)#6,369

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
77.8%
#3
75.0%
#4
75.0%
#5
62.1%
#6
55.6%
#7
53.8%
#8
38.9%
#9
33.3%
#10
30.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota?
Kidder has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota is 5.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.