Japanese Family Households
COMPARE
Japanese
Select to Compare
Family Households
Japanese Family Households
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,074,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 65.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.16% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Japanese and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Japanese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Japanese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants from Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Japanese Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese Data | Family Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.089% | 39.1% |
| Maximum | 46.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 46.7% | 60.9% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 66.2% |
| Median | 6.8% | 66.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 60.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 72.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 11.1% |
Correlation Details
| Japanese Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.089% | 191,173,429 | 62.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 32,034,077 | 67.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 11,040,415 | 66.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 5,586,569 | 69.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 2,870,552 | 67.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 1,545,873 | 68.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 1,268,098 | 65.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 537,392 | 64.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 401,596 | 67.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 83,848 | 62.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 184,192 | 67.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 208,256 | 75.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 147,545 | 69.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 638,209 | 60.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 60,107 | 75.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.30% | 473,882 | 69.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57% | 68,008 | 74.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 74,695 | 70.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 41,240 | 55.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 5,600 | 64.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 104,251 | 73.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 70,818 | 69.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.54% | 65,608 | 54.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.83% | 278 | 48.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.99% | 41,001 | 68.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 645 | 39.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 59,153 | 61.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 4,145 | 55.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.84% | 12,324 | 57.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.91% | 11,678 | 56.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.38% | 2,911 | 60.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81% | 59,460 | 74.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 27,848 | 82.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.25% | 2,588 | 64.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86% | 114,737 | 59.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 1,364 | 83.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 2,215 | 62.4% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.30% | 411 | 65.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.47% | 868 | 80.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.03% | 7,118 | 51.2% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.70% | 1,575 | 73.3% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.12% | 5,478 | 50.5% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.24% | 921 | 72.9% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.73% | 32,323 | 65.6% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.86% | 388 | 90.5% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.81% | 219 | 100.0% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.82% | 220 | 44.0% |