Immigrants from Portugal Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Portugal
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Portugal Family Households
65.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Portugal Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,766,633 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.477 and weighted average of 65.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.1% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Portugal and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Portugal influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Portugal simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Portugal by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Portugal are Swiss (65.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (65.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Guyanese (65.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Hopi (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants from Haiti | 99.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 99.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants from Laos | 99.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Crow | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants from Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants from Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants from Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Immigrants from Portugal Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Portugal Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.034% | 13.2% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 83.6% |
Range | 25.0% | 70.4% |
Mean | 5.9% | 64.7% |
Median | 4.6% | 66.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 60.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 70.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 10.6% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Portugal Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 139,022,571 | 62.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 16,736,633 | 68.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 5,415,783 | 67.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 3,127,785 | 69.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 2,571,554 | 66.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 1,312,982 | 65.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 645,323 | 65.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 670,464 | 67.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 688,136 | 70.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 308,907 | 65.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 475,930 | 73.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 319,929 | 64.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 197,755 | 70.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 221,623 | 58.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 362,744 | 60.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.91% | 104,757 | 60.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 343,717 | 62.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 215,673 | 73.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 26,676 | 72.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.41% | 120,839 | 71.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 163,270 | 65.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 31,505 | 75.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.80% | 184,081 | 68.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 103,810 | 72.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 83,553 | 69.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 13,404 | 53.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 77,829 | 67.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 37,993 | 52.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 90,831 | 65.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 16,296 | 61.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 18,624 | 55.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.89% | 19,850 | 69.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.12% | 43,579 | 72.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 32,800 | 71.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.44% | 64,636 | 67.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 111,351 | 63.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.64% | 3,620 | 80.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.90% | 2,654 | 60.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 82,314 | 73.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61% | 196 | 70.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.67% | 2,436 | 68.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 215 | 54.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 86,201 | 60.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.45% | 10,466 | 73.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.53% | 337 | 69.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 11,966 | 68.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 5,572 | 66.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.15% | 1,581 | 71.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.31% | 12,072 | 68.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.76% | 100,787 | 57.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 8.00% | 21,383 | 73.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 47,012 | 55.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 16,286 | 53.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.54% | 56,696 | 69.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.68% | 27,162 | 69.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.86% | 27,548 | 64.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.09% | 132 | 82.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 25,084 | 61.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.53% | 18,445 | 59.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 562 | 83.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.61% | 12,465 | 56.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 11.00% | 30,558 | 55.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 93,781 | 58.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.71% | 8,763 | 78.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.82% | 17,164 | 58.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.36% | 26,807 | 58.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.22% | 21,742 | 54.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.68% | 6,484 | 77.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.05% | 121 | 61.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.67% | 108 | 22.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.93% | 4,660 | 62.9% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.00% | 60 | 13.2% |