Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Households
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,791,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 63.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.15% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Zimbabwe influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Zimbabwe simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants from Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants from Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.017% | 31.0% |
Maximum | 16.5% | 89.0% |
Range | 16.5% | 57.9% |
Mean | 2.1% | 66.3% |
Median | 1.1% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.58% | 60.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 75.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 12.4% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.017% | 96,584,996 | 59.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.074% | 11,551,653 | 64.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 3,964,784 | 64.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 2,085,630 | 63.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 880,238 | 66.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 670,593 | 61.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 478,711 | 64.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 337,090 | 65.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 355,667 | 65.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 94,478 | 62.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 235,275 | 73.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 83,805 | 70.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 42,362 | 37.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 39,523 | 47.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 76,479 | 82.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 53,714 | 52.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.88% | 13,719 | 68.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 57,422 | 63.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 3,935 | 61.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 32,114 | 59.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 4,790 | 69.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 31,316 | 76.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 4,413 | 57.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 916 | 86.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 18,115 | 76.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 4,773 | 60.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 3,572 | 76.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 197 | 56.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 26,607 | 80.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 1,664 | 74.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 1,221 | 89.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.08% | 3,801 | 31.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 20,716 | 76.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 18,077 | 73.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 197 | 72.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 208 | 53.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 173 | 72.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 1,513 | 78.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 2,961 | 85.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 1,473 | 63.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.42% | 1,366 | 48.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 419 | 82.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.42% | 307 | 73.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.54% | 133 | 47.5% |