Iroquois Family Households
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
Family Households
Iroquois Family Households
62.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,819 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 62.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.28% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Cree (62.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Kenya (62.3%, a difference of 0.16%), African (62.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Albania (62.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants from Spain | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants from Kuwait | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants from Africa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants from Albania | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants from Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants from Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants from Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants from Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Iroquois Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.054% | 26.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 99.9% | 73.4% |
Mean | 18.9% | 64.2% |
Median | 11.3% | 64.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 60.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 69.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.4% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.2% | 13.9% |
Correlation Details
Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 203,068,630 | 61.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,854,287 | 61.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 581,974 | 62.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 221,781 | 61.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 295,752 | 60.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 35,437 | 66.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 53,417 | 59.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 39,289 | 64.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 11,474 | 64.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 5,622 | 65.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.07% | 2,211 | 65.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 2,481 | 67.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 10,561 | 73.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.56% | 839 | 65.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,568 | 64.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 272 | 48.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 63.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 356 | 60.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 60.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 72.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 66.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 36 | 33.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 1,097 | 68.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 69.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,207 | 69.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 72.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 2,076 | 69.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 885 | 64.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 44.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 58.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 61.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 61.9% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 62.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 26.6% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 70.6% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.27% | 132 | 57.7% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.26% | 138 | 54.3% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.77% | 117 | 100.0% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.12% | 160 | 53.6% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 39.7% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,222 | 76.0% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 74.7% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.31% | 59 | 100.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 66 | 100.0% |