Immigrants from Scotland Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Scotland Family Households
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
86.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,383,501 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129 and weighted average of 64.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.83% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Scotland influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Scotland simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from China (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants from Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants from China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants from Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants from Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants from North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants from Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants from Scotland Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.020% | 23.8% |
Maximum | 11.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 11.9% | 76.2% |
Mean | 2.2% | 66.5% |
Median | 1.7% | 65.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.78% | 60.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 72.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 13.7% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Scotland Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.020% | 142,116,418 | 61.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.069% | 31,278,689 | 65.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 10,231,361 | 64.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 4,808,990 | 67.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 2,927,462 | 64.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 1,423,089 | 65.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 1,001,319 | 69.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 591,540 | 66.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 420,893 | 59.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 383,692 | 67.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 308,006 | 67.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 110,700 | 63.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 153,978 | 60.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 108,196 | 67.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 113,635 | 75.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 32,359 | 62.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 22,354 | 65.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 60,654 | 61.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 26,979 | 68.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 33,684 | 64.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 20,482 | 81.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 5,265 | 69.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 22,289 | 72.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 6,412 | 71.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 21,979 | 65.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31% | 1,528 | 57.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 34,211 | 63.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,360 | 87.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 8,022 | 54.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 2,435 | 81.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 12,678 | 69.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 3,329 | 62.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 8,568 | 67.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 279 | 53.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 9,695 | 69.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 5,063 | 80.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 1,172 | 87.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 9,513 | 84.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 2,900 | 58.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 238 | 60.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 2,160 | 76.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 3,920 | 70.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 1,260 | 74.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 254 | 69.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.45% | 163 | 72.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 240 | 64.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 598 | 59.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 1,462 | 62.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 6,051 | 90.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 4,880 | 59.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.04% | 3,120 | 76.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 1,824 | 47.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 887 | 51.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 837 | 54.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 1,101 | 97.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.02% | 547 | 57.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 143 | 23.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.47% | 470 | 32.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.88% | 1,824 | 45.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.00% | 20 | 72.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.50% | 981 | 60.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 231 | 89.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86% | 631 | 73.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.82% | 397 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.90% | 84 | 28.2% |