Immigrants from Oceania Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Oceania Family Households
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.77% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Oceania influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Oceania simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Immigrants from Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants from Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants from Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants from Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.11% | 8.8% |
Maximum | 65.7% | 91.4% |
Range | 65.6% | 82.6% |
Mean | 10.0% | 64.5% |
Median | 7.9% | 67.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 62.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 71.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 15.2% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Oceania Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.11% | 281,208,818 | 63.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 14,196,242 | 64.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 4,767,156 | 65.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 2,249,425 | 66.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 824,961 | 68.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 510,963 | 69.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.84% | 636,165 | 61.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 184,131 | 73.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 261,846 | 67.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 83,227 | 62.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 81,303 | 72.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 208,937 | 74.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.43% | 42,814 | 70.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 4,433 | 70.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.32% | 6,901 | 70.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.93% | 5,914 | 60.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.12% | 63,455 | 73.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 15,342 | 62.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.06% | 6,602 | 54.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.45% | 5,221 | 67.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 624 | 53.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.32% | 719 | 66.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 2,174 | 76.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25% | 4,185 | 63.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.67% | 1,059 | 67.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 1,858 | 69.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.26% | 212 | 86.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.33% | 73 | 31.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.94% | 7,236 | 74.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.36% | 5,411 | 75.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 102 | 64.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 198 | 91.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.09% | 188 | 22.7% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.76% | 693 | 66.7% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.16% | 398 | 65.6% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.66% | 99 | 8.8% |