Chinese Family Households
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
Family Households
Chinese Family Households
68.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 68.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.66% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Vietnam (68.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (68.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pueblo (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (68.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Immigrants from Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
| Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Immigrants from Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Chinese Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese Data | Family Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.0087% | 47.5% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 82.6% |
| Range | 8.3% | 35.1% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 68.6% |
| Median | 1.2% | 69.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.58% | 65.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 73.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 7.5% |
Correlation Details
| Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,055,746 | 59.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 5,049,043 | 65.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,538,210 | 69.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,149,266 | 70.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 66.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 242,519 | 67.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 67.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 264,410 | 67.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 172,813 | 68.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 107,016 | 75.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 70.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 76,395 | 65.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 117,219 | 69.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 79,978 | 63.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 263,904 | 78.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 104,383 | 72.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 114,487 | 70.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 82,656 | 65.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 62.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 24,095 | 67.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 73.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 78,354 | 73.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 73.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 54,182 | 67.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,292 | 73.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 39,437 | 54.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 76.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 77.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 72.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 76.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 27,739 | 47.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 70.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 50,142 | 56.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 76.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 45,392 | 73.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 73.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 77.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 73.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 69.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 72.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 465 | 49.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 68.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 75.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 71.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,507 | 66.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,576 | 68.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 159 | 61.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 8,571 | 69.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 130 | 60.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 279 | 73.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 69.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 82.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 72.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 548 | 59.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 5,065 | 82.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 853 | 52.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 157 | 54.5% |