Arab Family Households
COMPARE
Arab
Select to Compare
Family Households
Arab Family Households
64.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
24.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,389,490 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435 and weighted average of 64.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.31% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Arabs and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Arabs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Arabs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Arabs by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Zimbabwean (64.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Lithuanian (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), French (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Asia (64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Paraguayan (64.1%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Puerto Ricans | 33.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 64.2% |
Immigrants from Iran | 30.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 64.1% |
Spanish Americans | 30.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 64.1% |
Northern Europeans | 28.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 64.1% |
Paraguayans | 26.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 64.1% |
Immigrants from Western Asia | 25.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 64.1% |
Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
Immigrants from North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants from Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Arab Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arab Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.20% | 38.9% |
Maximum | 82.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 82.0% | 61.1% |
Mean | 17.8% | 69.2% |
Median | 13.5% | 67.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 70.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 11.7% |
Correlation Details
Arab Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 197,245,630 | 66.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 128,140,918 | 64.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 73,918,696 | 62.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 39,503,091 | 62.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 15,917,448 | 63.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 11,171,624 | 63.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 6,874,366 | 63.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 3,306,681 | 67.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 2,101,274 | 65.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 2,141,312 | 60.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 940,941 | 64.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 840,728 | 70.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 681,743 | 64.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 442,778 | 67.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.93% | 219,868 | 68.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.31% | 415,222 | 66.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 283,117 | 66.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 141,035 | 67.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 282,500 | 66.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.98% | 199,092 | 67.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 84,443 | 69.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.86% | 322,956 | 67.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.36% | 30,824 | 61.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.63% | 86,980 | 70.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.17% | 53,472 | 71.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.42% | 98,207 | 58.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 127,955 | 67.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 145,544 | 70.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 47,371 | 61.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.14% | 51,471 | 75.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.43% | 22,082 | 66.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 122 | 56.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.53% | 38,222 | 67.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.60% | 72,809 | 71.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.24% | 1,215 | 100.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.46% | 332 | 38.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 156 | 91.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.87% | 2,042 | 78.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 34,046 | 60.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.52% | 1,132 | 67.5% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.22% | 25,511 | 56.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.50% | 120 | 72.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.09% | 94 | 70.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 952 | 59.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.52% | 54 | 87.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.02% | 8,551 | 69.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.38% | 211 | 66.7% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.62% | 160 | 51.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.57% | 51 | 60.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.88% | 96 | 73.1% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.30% | 43,213 | 71.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.80% | 314 | 62.1% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.93% | 598 | 100.0% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.52% | 27,894 | 72.5% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 32.00% | 12,405 | 70.7% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.47% | 62,492 | 68.5% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.38% | 5,526 | 51.9% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.00% | 150 | 100.0% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.01% | 108,414 | 66.2% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.98% | 40,392 | 69.5% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.01% | 117 | 85.7% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.71% | 8,919 | 62.8% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.91% | 660 | 100.0% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.10% | 53,044 | 70.4% |
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.24% | 107 | 100.0% |