Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Households
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,445,494 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 63.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.0063% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Eastern European (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 34.4% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 18.1% | 65.6% |
Mean | 2.7% | 64.8% |
Median | 1.9% | 63.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.87% | 59.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 70.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 11.7% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 130,946,311 | 62.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 39,414,296 | 63.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,221,197 | 63.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 5,209,777 | 62.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 3,101,532 | 66.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,517,285 | 63.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,263,015 | 63.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 613,737 | 65.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 438,835 | 63.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 375,939 | 63.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 276,746 | 62.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 287,974 | 66.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 96,067 | 59.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 127,463 | 64.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 73,297 | 63.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 13,000 | 71.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 128,232 | 68.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 41,413 | 63.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 39,657 | 61.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 32,075 | 83.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 19,747 | 69.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 29,269 | 61.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 21,542 | 54.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 31,003 | 75.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 8,415 | 69.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,723 | 51.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 3,104 | 75.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 10,027 | 67.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 902 | 72.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 27,614 | 48.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 5,413 | 76.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 782 | 79.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 1,689 | 49.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 5,064 | 68.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 2,854 | 61.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 2,704 | 76.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 2,460 | 55.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 1,975 | 66.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 721 | 39.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,317 | 75.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 691 | 68.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 210 | 54.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,436 | 68.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,763 | 77.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 64.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 1,246 | 84.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,686 | 47.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 3,664 | 67.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 642 | 61.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 6,019 | 63.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 417 | 53.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 1,272 | 81.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 115 | 34.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.39% | 296 | 64.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 1,289 | 48.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 355 | 93.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 197 | 46.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 2,002 | 75.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,636 | 64.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 225 | 49.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.14% | 86 | 56.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 83 | 60.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 346 | 82.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.96% | 146 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.13% | 364 | 49.3% |