Irish vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Irish
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Irish
Chickasaw
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
21.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,675,928 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 22.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Irish | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 7.7% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.3% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 34.3% | 35.8% |
| Median | 21.2% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.4% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.5% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.5% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.4% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Irish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Nigerian (21.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants (21.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kenya (21.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Haiti (21.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |