Immigrants from Canada vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Canada
Chippewa
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 458,964,153 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 36.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Canada | Chippewa |
Minimum | 3.5% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 78.4% |
Range | 96.5% | 71.4% |
Mean | 26.2% | 25.6% |
Median | 16.9% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.5% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.2% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |