Immigrants from North Macedonia vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,961,294 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from North Macedonia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North Macedonia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.082% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North Macedonia corresponds to a decrease of 82.0 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,741 compared to $82,810, a difference of 8.4%), median male earnings ($59,189 compared to $54,722, a difference of 8.2%), and median earnings ($49,658 compared to $46,026, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($40,488 compared to $38,436, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,175 compared to $57,975, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.7%), single female poverty (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father poverty (17.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 22.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.73%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.0%), bachelor's degree (39.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.24%), high school diploma (90.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and 11th grade (93.5% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 49.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.2%).