Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chickasaw
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 34.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 59.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 58.6% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 18.9% | 35.8% |
| Median | 18.6% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |