Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Spanish American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Spanish American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Spanish American Indians
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Spanish American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,202,367 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.256 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,136,112 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 3.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 5.3% | 7.6% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 48.9% |
Range | 40.2% | 41.2% |
Mean | 17.3% | 16.8% |
Median | 15.1% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 17.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Spanish American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Osage (14.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Fijian (14.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |