Afghan vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Afghan
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Afghans
Chickasaw
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
63.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,686,157 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 22.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Afghan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.91% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 33.3% |
Range | 24.7% | 29.7% |
Mean | 9.5% | 12.7% |
Median | 8.4% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |