Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 45-54
83.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,437,318 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204 and weighted average of 83.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.71% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Serbian (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Somalia (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (83.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Colombian (83.4%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
Asians | 97.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chileans | 97.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Colombia | 97.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Taiwanese | 97.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia | 97.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Colombians | 97.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 97.1 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Somalia | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Estonians | 96.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Russians | 96.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Cubans | 96.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Egypt | 96.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Belgians | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Croatia | 96.5 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 53.5% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 18.1% | 46.5% |
Mean | 2.5% | 85.1% |
Median | 1.8% | 84.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.85% | 81.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 90.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 9.8% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 130,946,311 | 82.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 39,414,296 | 83.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,221,197 | 83.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 5,209,777 | 83.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 3,101,532 | 84.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,517,285 | 84.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,259,098 | 83.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 613,737 | 83.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 438,835 | 81.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 375,939 | 85.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 276,746 | 83.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 287,974 | 84.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 96,067 | 84.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 127,463 | 81.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 73,297 | 86.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 13,000 | 79.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 128,232 | 86.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 41,413 | 87.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 39,657 | 84.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 30,382 | 87.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 19,747 | 77.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 29,269 | 85.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 21,542 | 81.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 31,003 | 84.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 8,415 | 85.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,723 | 81.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 3,104 | 69.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 10,027 | 88.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 902 | 84.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 27,614 | 87.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 5,413 | 83.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 782 | 100.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.90% | 999 | 80.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 5,064 | 94.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 2,854 | 81.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 2,704 | 67.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 2,460 | 90.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 1,975 | 95.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,317 | 78.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 691 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 210 | 81.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,436 | 99.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,763 | 61.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 80.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 1,246 | 93.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,686 | 74.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 3,664 | 89.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 642 | 53.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 6,019 | 93.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 417 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 1,272 | 85.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.62% | 995 | 98.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 115 | 66.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.39% | 296 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.48% | 223 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 1,289 | 86.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 355 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 197 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,636 | 70.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.14% | 86 | 75.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 83 | 75.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 346 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.13% | 364 | 100.0% |