Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Dallas, TX

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Dallas
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Dallas

8.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Dallas Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Dallas, TX

Zip Code Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. 75246 100.0% 35.8% (+64.2)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#128
2. 75203 54.7% 35.8% (+18.9)#322 33.1% (+21.6)#5,526
3. 75216 53.9% 35.8% (+18.1)#332 33.1% (+20.8)#5,700
4. 75217 50.1% 35.8% (+14.3)#395 33.1% (+16.9)#6,505
5. 75237 46.9% 35.8% (+11.1)#468 33.1% (+13.8)#7,553
6. 75215 46.6% 35.8% (+10.8)#472 33.1% (+13.4)#7,691
7. 75249 44.4% 35.8% (+8.60)#519 33.1% (+11.3)#8,355
8. 75254 44.3% 35.8% (+8.52)#522 33.1% (+11.2)#8,375
9. 75218 43.7% 35.8% (+7.93)#534 33.1% (+10.6)#8,560
10. 75212 43.6% 35.8% (+7.85)#537 33.1% (+10.5)#8,575
11. 75253 42.1% 35.8% (+6.33)#569 33.1% (+8.99)#9,036
12. 75220 41.7% 35.8% (+5.89)#573 33.1% (+8.55)#9,149
13. 75240 41.3% 35.8% (+5.51)#587 33.1% (+8.17)#9,311
14. 75228 41.1% 35.8% (+5.26)#595 33.1% (+7.92)#9,397
15. 75211 40.6% 35.8% (+4.78)#599 33.1% (+7.44)#9,552
16. 75252 40.2% 35.8% (+4.41)#611 33.1% (+7.07)#9,680
17. 75231 38.6% 35.8% (+2.76)#650 33.1% (+5.42)#10,298
18. 75204 36.5% 35.8% (+0.746)#707 33.1% (+3.41)#11,067
19. 75210 35.5% 35.8% (-0.301)#744 33.1% (+2.36)#11,480
20. 75232 34.6% 35.8% (-1.22)#760 33.1% (+1.44)#11,814
21. 75233 34.5% 35.8% (-1.32)#765 33.1% (+1.34)#11,851
22. 75224 34.4% 35.8% (-1.40)#767 33.1% (+1.26)#11,877
23. 75243 33.3% 35.8% (-2.46)#792 33.1% (+0.198)#12,223
24. 75235 32.1% 35.8% (-3.66)#839 33.1% (-1.00)#12,864
25. 75241 31.5% 35.8% (-4.27)#855 33.1% (-1.61)#13,108
26. 75223 30.9% 35.8% (-4.85)#872 33.1% (-2.19)#13,328
27. 75227 29.1% 35.8% (-6.72)#922 33.1% (-4.06)#14,081
28. 75236 29.0% 35.8% (-6.83)#926 33.1% (-4.17)#14,115
29. 75208 27.6% 35.8% (-8.23)#968 33.1% (-5.57)#14,681
30. 75229 27.2% 35.8% (-8.56)#978 33.1% (-5.90)#14,825
31. 75205 25.1% 35.8% (-10.7)#1,015 33.1% (-8.08)#15,594
32. 75201 25.0% 35.8% (-10.8)#1,016 33.1% (-8.14)#15,607
33. 75287 23.9% 35.8% (-11.9)#1,048 33.1% (-9.28)#16,161
34. 75206 23.7% 35.8% (-12.1)#1,049 33.1% (-9.46)#16,227
35. 75248 20.1% 35.8% (-15.7)#1,122 33.1% (-13.0)#17,608
36. 75225 19.8% 35.8% (-16.0)#1,130 33.1% (-13.3)#17,822
37. 75219 19.4% 35.8% (-16.4)#1,136 33.1% (-13.8)#17,952
38. 75214 15.1% 35.8% (-20.7)#1,241 33.1% (-18.0)#19,547
39. 75238 14.3% 35.8% (-21.5)#1,259 33.1% (-18.8)#19,786
40. 75230 14.3% 35.8% (-21.5)#1,262 33.1% (-18.8)#19,798
41. 75234 12.0% 35.8% (-23.8)#1,303 33.1% (-21.2)#20,620
42. 75244 8.0% 35.8% (-27.8)#1,355 33.1% (-25.2)#21,718

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Dallas, TX?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Dallas, TX are:
#1
100.0%
#2
54.7%
#3
53.9%
#4
50.1%
#5
46.9%
#6
46.6%
#7
44.4%
#8
44.3%
#9
43.7%
#10
43.6%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Dallas, TX?
75246 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Dallas, TX with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Dallas, TX?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Dallas is 37.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas is 35.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.