Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Dallas
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas

45.1%
4.6%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 75244 4.6% 27.2% (-22.6)#35 24.1% (-19.5)#856
2. 75214 8.4% 27.2% (-18.8)#111 24.1% (-15.7)#2,545
3. 75234 9.5% 27.2% (-17.6)#147 24.1% (-14.6)#3,138
4. 75248 9.6% 27.2% (-17.6)#149 24.1% (-14.5)#3,187
5. 75238 12.5% 27.2% (-14.6)#242 24.1% (-11.5)#4,841
6. 75219 14.1% 27.2% (-13.1)#284 24.1% (-10.0)#5,728
7. 75235 14.9% 27.2% (-12.3)#309 24.1% (-9.21)#6,179
8. 75206 16.0% 27.2% (-11.2)#346 24.1% (-8.09)#6,865
9. 75229 16.1% 27.2% (-11.1)#354 24.1% (-8.02)#6,902
10. 75218 17.6% 27.2% (-9.55)#404 24.1% (-6.46)#7,794
11. 75232 19.2% 27.2% (-7.92)#458 24.1% (-4.83)#8,769
12. 75208 20.8% 27.2% (-6.36)#506 24.1% (-3.27)#9,658
13. 75287 21.4% 27.2% (-5.80)#528 24.1% (-2.71)#9,934
14. 75223 21.6% 27.2% (-5.54)#534 24.1% (-2.45)#10,084
15. 75224 22.7% 27.2% (-4.44)#570 24.1% (-1.35)#10,708
16. 75236 23.0% 27.2% (-4.18)#576 24.1% (-1.10)#10,850
17. 75243 23.1% 27.2% (-4.11)#580 24.1% (-1.02)#10,884
18. 75227 24.7% 27.2% (-2.42)#637 24.1% (+0.665)#11,833
19. 75205 25.2% 27.2% (-1.94)#655 24.1% (+1.14)#12,156
20. 75201 25.8% 27.2% (-1.32)#684 24.1% (+1.77)#12,486
21. 75233 26.3% 27.2% (-0.841)#711 24.1% (+2.25)#12,747
22. 75231 26.9% 27.2% (-0.263)#734 24.1% (+2.82)#13,036
23. 75241 28.0% 27.2% (+0.792)#780 24.1% (+3.88)#13,585
24. 75204 30.0% 27.2% (+2.80)#846 24.1% (+5.88)#14,577
25. 75210 30.0% 27.2% (+2.84)#847 24.1% (+5.92)#14,586
26. 75254 30.1% 27.2% (+2.91)#848 24.1% (+6.00)#14,670
27. 75230 30.3% 27.2% (+3.12)#859 24.1% (+6.21)#14,747
28. 75228 30.7% 27.2% (+3.54)#872 24.1% (+6.63)#14,926
29. 75240 32.1% 27.2% (+4.89)#913 24.1% (+7.98)#15,499
30. 75211 32.1% 27.2% (+4.91)#915 24.1% (+8.00)#15,505
31. 75249 32.3% 27.2% (+5.16)#920 24.1% (+8.24)#15,608
32. 75215 32.8% 27.2% (+5.65)#937 24.1% (+8.74)#15,797
33. 75252 35.7% 27.2% (+8.56)#1,018 24.1% (+11.6)#17,014
34. 75220 35.8% 27.2% (+8.59)#1,019 24.1% (+11.7)#17,025
35. 75253 35.9% 27.2% (+8.73)#1,021 24.1% (+11.8)#17,053
36. 75237 37.1% 27.2% (+9.95)#1,051 24.1% (+13.0)#17,459
37. 75212 38.1% 27.2% (+10.9)#1,068 24.1% (+14.0)#17,774
38. 75216 40.9% 27.2% (+13.7)#1,131 24.1% (+16.8)#18,638
39. 75217 41.6% 27.2% (+14.4)#1,141 24.1% (+17.5)#18,814
40. 75225 42.7% 27.2% (+15.5)#1,164 24.1% (+18.6)#19,115
41. 75203 42.8% 27.2% (+15.6)#1,166 24.1% (+18.7)#19,129
42. 75246 45.1% 27.2% (+17.9)#1,211 24.1% (+21.0)#19,710

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
0.0%
#4
0.0%
#5
0.0%
#6
4.6%
#7
8.4%
#8
9.5%
#9
9.6%
#10
12.5%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX?
75244 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX with 4.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas is 28.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Texas?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Texas is 27.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.