Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nashville, TN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaScotlandSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaScotlandSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nashville
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nashville

20.8%
53.8%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nashville Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nashville, TN

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. 37215 53.8% 32.0% (+21.8)#37 33.4% (+20.4)#3,227
2. 37217 46.9% 32.0% (+14.9)#73 33.4% (+13.5)#5,710
3. 37216 46.9% 32.0% (+14.9)#74 33.4% (+13.5)#5,714
4. 37214 44.0% 32.0% (+12.0)#84 33.4% (+10.6)#6,797
5. 37211 42.9% 32.0% (+10.9)#88 33.4% (+9.50)#7,181
6. 37205 37.6% 32.0% (+5.60)#112 33.4% (+4.20)#9,400
7. 37207 37.4% 32.0% (+5.40)#114 33.4% (+4.00)#9,494
8. 37206 34.0% 32.0% (+2.00)#136 33.4% (+0.600)#10,959
9. 37221 32.6% 32.0% (+0.600)#147 33.4% (-0.800)#11,533
10. 37219 32.0% 32.0% (=0.000)#150 33.4% (-1.40)#11,785
11. 37203 27.8% 32.0% (-4.20)#168 33.4% (-5.60)#13,413
12. 37201 26.9% 32.0% (-5.10)#173 33.4% (-6.50)#13,732
13. 37209 25.4% 32.0% (-6.60)#177 33.4% (-8.00)#14,177
14. 37208 22.7% 32.0% (-9.30)#191 33.4% (-10.7)#15,040
15. 37210 22.2% 32.0% (-9.80)#192 33.4% (-11.2)#15,209
16. 37212 22.0% 32.0% (-10.00)#193 33.4% (-11.4)#15,257
17. 37228 21.8% 32.0% (-10.2)#197 33.4% (-11.6)#15,415
18. 37204 20.8% 32.0% (-11.2)#210 33.4% (-12.6)#15,926

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nashville, TN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nashville, TN are:
#1
53.8%
#2
46.9%
#3
46.9%
#4
44.0%
#5
42.9%
#6
37.6%
#7
37.4%
#8
34.0%
#9
32.6%
#10
32.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nashville, TN?
37215 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nashville, TN with 53.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nashville, TN?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nashville is 29.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tennessee?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tennessee is 32.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.