Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaScotlandSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaScotlandSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nashville
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville

64.5%
2.2%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN

Zip Code Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. 37204 2.2% 19.6% (-17.5)#17 17.0% (-14.8)#1,214
2. 37212 3.5% 19.6% (-16.2)#38 17.0% (-13.5)#2,319
3. 37216 3.8% 19.6% (-15.8)#41 17.0% (-13.1)#2,644
4. 37215 4.0% 19.6% (-15.6)#45 17.0% (-12.9)#2,822
5. 37221 5.4% 19.6% (-14.3)#62 17.0% (-11.6)#4,026
6. 37220 7.6% 19.6% (-12.0)#96 17.0% (-9.35)#5,963
7. 37214 20.7% 19.6% (+1.10)#275 17.0% (+3.77)#14,625
8. 37209 23.7% 19.6% (+4.04)#314 17.0% (+6.71)#16,031
9. 37217 24.4% 19.6% (+4.81)#323 17.0% (+7.47)#16,337
10. 37211 25.6% 19.6% (+5.93)#338 17.0% (+8.59)#16,803
11. 37210 28.4% 19.6% (+8.72)#368 17.0% (+11.4)#17,839
12. 37228 37.8% 19.6% (+18.1)#430 17.0% (+20.8)#20,340
13. 37206 38.7% 19.6% (+19.0)#437 17.0% (+21.7)#20,514
14. 37203 48.0% 19.6% (+28.3)#461 17.0% (+31.0)#21,823
15. 37207 49.7% 19.6% (+30.1)#468 17.0% (+32.8)#21,990
16. 37218 52.4% 19.6% (+32.8)#475 17.0% (+35.5)#22,283
17. 37208 64.5% 19.6% (+44.8)#492 17.0% (+47.5)#23,057

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
0.0%
#4
2.2%
#5
3.5%
#6
3.8%
#7
4.0%
#8
5.4%
#9
7.6%
#10
20.7%
What zip code has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN?
37204 has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN with 2.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville is 24.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tennessee?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tennessee is 19.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.