Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaScotlandSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaScotlandSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nashville
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville

2.2%
64.5%
Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN

Zip Code Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. 37208 64.5% 19.6% (+44.8)#20 17.0% (+47.5)#1,052
2. 37218 52.4% 19.6% (+32.8)#37 17.0% (+35.5)#1,826
3. 37207 49.7% 19.6% (+30.1)#44 17.0% (+32.8)#2,119
4. 37203 48.0% 19.6% (+28.3)#51 17.0% (+31.0)#2,286
5. 37206 38.7% 19.6% (+19.0)#75 17.0% (+21.7)#3,595
6. 37228 37.8% 19.6% (+18.1)#82 17.0% (+20.8)#3,766
7. 37210 28.4% 19.6% (+8.72)#144 17.0% (+11.4)#6,270
8. 37211 25.6% 19.6% (+5.93)#174 17.0% (+8.59)#7,306
9. 37217 24.4% 19.6% (+4.81)#189 17.0% (+7.47)#7,772
10. 37209 23.7% 19.6% (+4.04)#198 17.0% (+6.71)#8,071
11. 37214 20.7% 19.6% (+1.10)#237 17.0% (+3.77)#9,484
12. 37220 7.6% 19.6% (-12.0)#416 17.0% (-9.35)#18,146
13. 37221 5.4% 19.6% (-14.3)#450 17.0% (-11.6)#20,083
14. 37215 4.0% 19.6% (-15.6)#467 17.0% (-12.9)#21,287
15. 37216 3.8% 19.6% (-15.8)#471 17.0% (-13.1)#21,465
16. 37212 3.5% 19.6% (-16.2)#474 17.0% (-13.5)#21,790
17. 37204 2.2% 19.6% (-17.5)#495 17.0% (-14.8)#22,895

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN are:
#1
64.5%
#2
52.4%
#3
49.7%
#4
48.0%
#5
38.7%
#6
37.8%
#7
28.4%
#8
25.6%
#9
24.4%
#10
23.7%
What zip code has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN?
37208 has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN with 64.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville, TN?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nashville is 24.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tennessee?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tennessee is 19.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.