Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minneapolis
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis

100.0%
7.7%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 55424 7.7% 27.7% (-20.0)#116 35.2% (-27.5)#2,339
2. 55439 9.0% 27.7% (-18.6)#157 35.2% (-26.1)#3,149
3. 55444 9.7% 27.7% (-17.9)#174 35.2% (-25.5)#3,611
4. 55449 12.4% 27.7% (-15.3)#263 35.2% (-22.8)#5,617
5. 55448 16.4% 27.7% (-11.3)#422 35.2% (-18.8)#9,378
6. 55434 17.4% 27.7% (-10.3)#465 35.2% (-17.8)#10,323
7. 55446 17.5% 27.7% (-10.2)#474 35.2% (-17.7)#10,465
8. 55410 18.0% 27.7% (-9.67)#497 35.2% (-17.2)#10,943
9. 55417 19.7% 27.7% (-8.00)#546 35.2% (-15.5)#12,588
10. 55438 20.5% 27.7% (-7.18)#571 35.2% (-14.7)#13,373
11. 55419 21.8% 27.7% (-5.89)#610 35.2% (-13.4)#14,554
12. 55445 21.8% 27.7% (-5.83)#611 35.2% (-13.3)#14,600
13. 55442 22.3% 27.7% (-5.38)#629 35.2% (-12.9)#15,025
14. 55436 23.8% 27.7% (-3.92)#658 35.2% (-11.4)#16,357
15. 55447 24.2% 27.7% (-3.52)#670 35.2% (-11.0)#16,708
16. 55443 25.8% 27.7% (-1.88)#705 35.2% (-9.39)#18,115
17. 55422 26.9% 27.7% (-0.732)#716 35.2% (-8.24)#18,964
18. 55412 28.3% 27.7% (+0.670)#732 35.2% (-6.84)#19,961
19. 55409 30.4% 27.7% (+2.71)#747 35.2% (-4.80)#21,297
20. 55437 30.9% 27.7% (+3.23)#753 35.2% (-4.28)#21,604
21. 55431 31.0% 27.7% (+3.30)#756 35.2% (-4.21)#21,657
22. 55433 32.1% 27.7% (+4.40)#763 35.2% (-3.10)#22,301
23. 55427 32.2% 27.7% (+4.55)#765 35.2% (-2.96)#22,379
24. 55406 33.2% 27.7% (+5.53)#771 35.2% (-1.98)#22,884
25. 55420 33.4% 27.7% (+5.77)#772 35.2% (-1.74)#23,015
26. 55426 35.2% 27.7% (+7.54)#782 35.2% (+0.035)#23,858
27. 55430 35.7% 27.7% (+8.00)#784 35.2% (+0.492)#24,064
28. 55418 36.9% 27.7% (+9.24)#790 35.2% (+1.73)#24,574
29. 55432 37.0% 27.7% (+9.28)#791 35.2% (+1.78)#24,602
30. 55423 38.2% 27.7% (+10.6)#798 35.2% (+3.06)#25,092
31. 55441 39.2% 27.7% (+11.5)#802 35.2% (+3.99)#25,443
32. 55407 39.5% 27.7% (+11.8)#803 35.2% (+4.31)#25,543
33. 55421 39.7% 27.7% (+12.0)#805 35.2% (+4.47)#25,592
34. 55429 43.5% 27.7% (+15.8)#814 35.2% (+8.33)#26,660
35. 55428 44.3% 27.7% (+16.7)#816 35.2% (+9.14)#26,860
36. 55416 49.3% 27.7% (+21.6)#821 35.2% (+14.1)#27,890
37. 55411 50.2% 27.7% (+22.5)#823 35.2% (+15.0)#28,051
38. 55435 55.2% 27.7% (+27.5)#829 35.2% (+20.0)#28,793
39. 55425 60.2% 27.7% (+32.6)#837 35.2% (+25.0)#29,324
40. 55413 61.3% 27.7% (+33.6)#838 35.2% (+26.1)#29,412
41. 55405 63.6% 27.7% (+36.0)#840 35.2% (+28.5)#29,609
42. 55415 65.2% 27.7% (+37.5)#842 35.2% (+30.0)#29,730
43. 55401 69.1% 27.7% (+41.4)#844 35.2% (+33.9)#29,990
44. 55408 75.3% 27.7% (+47.6)#848 35.2% (+40.1)#30,278
45. 55403 75.7% 27.7% (+48.1)#849 35.2% (+40.6)#30,290
46. 55404 82.8% 27.7% (+55.1)#852 35.2% (+47.6)#30,494
47. 55414 83.5% 27.7% (+55.9)#853 35.2% (+48.4)#30,516
48. 55454 90.2% 27.7% (+62.5)#854 35.2% (+55.0)#30,641
49. 55455 100.0% 27.7% (+72.3)#855 35.2% (+64.8)#30,829
50. 55402 100.0% 27.7% (+72.3)#856 35.2% (+64.8)#30,913

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN are:
#1
7.7%
#2
9.0%
#3
9.7%
#4
12.4%
#5
16.4%
#6
17.4%
#7
17.5%
#8
18.0%
#9
19.7%
#10
20.5%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN?
55424 has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN with 7.7%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis is 51.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minnesota?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minnesota is 27.7%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.