Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minneapolis
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis

7.7%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 55455 100.0% 27.7% (+72.3)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#26
2. 55402 100.0% 27.7% (+72.3)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#110
3. 55454 90.2% 27.7% (+62.5)#5 35.2% (+55.0)#461
4. 55414 83.5% 27.7% (+55.9)#6 35.2% (+48.4)#586
5. 55404 82.8% 27.7% (+55.1)#7 35.2% (+47.6)#608
6. 55403 75.7% 27.7% (+48.1)#10 35.2% (+40.6)#812
7. 55408 75.3% 27.7% (+47.6)#11 35.2% (+40.1)#824
8. 55401 69.1% 27.7% (+41.4)#15 35.2% (+33.9)#1,112
9. 55415 65.2% 27.7% (+37.5)#17 35.2% (+30.0)#1,372
10. 55405 63.6% 27.7% (+36.0)#19 35.2% (+28.5)#1,493
11. 55413 61.3% 27.7% (+33.6)#21 35.2% (+26.1)#1,690
12. 55425 60.2% 27.7% (+32.6)#22 35.2% (+25.0)#1,778
13. 55435 55.2% 27.7% (+27.5)#30 35.2% (+20.0)#2,309
14. 55411 50.2% 27.7% (+22.5)#36 35.2% (+15.0)#3,051
15. 55416 49.3% 27.7% (+21.6)#38 35.2% (+14.1)#3,212
16. 55428 44.3% 27.7% (+16.7)#43 35.2% (+9.14)#4,242
17. 55429 43.5% 27.7% (+15.8)#45 35.2% (+8.33)#4,442
18. 55421 39.7% 27.7% (+12.0)#54 35.2% (+4.47)#5,510
19. 55407 39.5% 27.7% (+11.8)#56 35.2% (+4.31)#5,559
20. 55441 39.2% 27.7% (+11.5)#57 35.2% (+3.99)#5,659
21. 55423 38.2% 27.7% (+10.6)#61 35.2% (+3.06)#6,010
22. 55432 37.0% 27.7% (+9.28)#68 35.2% (+1.78)#6,500
23. 55418 36.9% 27.7% (+9.24)#69 35.2% (+1.73)#6,528
24. 55430 35.7% 27.7% (+8.00)#75 35.2% (+0.492)#7,038
25. 55426 35.2% 27.7% (+7.54)#77 35.2% (+0.035)#7,244
26. 55420 33.4% 27.7% (+5.77)#87 35.2% (-1.74)#8,087
27. 55406 33.2% 27.7% (+5.53)#88 35.2% (-1.98)#8,218
28. 55427 32.2% 27.7% (+4.55)#94 35.2% (-2.96)#8,721
29. 55433 32.1% 27.7% (+4.40)#96 35.2% (-3.10)#8,801
30. 55431 31.0% 27.7% (+3.30)#103 35.2% (-4.21)#9,445
31. 55437 30.9% 27.7% (+3.23)#106 35.2% (-4.28)#9,498
32. 55409 30.4% 27.7% (+2.71)#112 35.2% (-4.80)#9,803
33. 55412 28.3% 27.7% (+0.670)#127 35.2% (-6.84)#11,141
34. 55422 26.9% 27.7% (-0.732)#143 35.2% (-8.24)#12,138
35. 55443 25.8% 27.7% (-1.88)#154 35.2% (-9.39)#12,987
36. 55447 24.2% 27.7% (-3.52)#189 35.2% (-11.0)#14,394
37. 55436 23.8% 27.7% (-3.92)#201 35.2% (-11.4)#14,745
38. 55442 22.3% 27.7% (-5.38)#230 35.2% (-12.9)#16,077
39. 55445 21.8% 27.7% (-5.83)#248 35.2% (-13.3)#16,502
40. 55419 21.8% 27.7% (-5.89)#249 35.2% (-13.4)#16,548
41. 55438 20.5% 27.7% (-7.18)#288 35.2% (-14.7)#17,729
42. 55417 19.7% 27.7% (-8.00)#313 35.2% (-15.5)#18,514
43. 55410 18.0% 27.7% (-9.67)#362 35.2% (-17.2)#20,159
44. 55446 17.5% 27.7% (-10.2)#385 35.2% (-17.7)#20,637
45. 55434 17.4% 27.7% (-10.3)#394 35.2% (-17.8)#20,779
46. 55448 16.4% 27.7% (-11.3)#437 35.2% (-18.8)#21,724
47. 55449 12.4% 27.7% (-15.3)#596 35.2% (-22.8)#25,485
48. 55444 9.7% 27.7% (-17.9)#685 35.2% (-25.5)#27,491
49. 55439 9.0% 27.7% (-18.6)#702 35.2% (-26.1)#27,953
50. 55424 7.7% 27.7% (-20.0)#743 35.2% (-27.5)#28,763

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
90.2%
#4
83.5%
#5
82.8%
#6
75.7%
#7
75.3%
#8
69.1%
#9
65.2%
#10
63.6%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN?
55455 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minneapolis is 51.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minnesota?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Minnesota is 27.7%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.