Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minneapolis
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minneapolis

92.3%
9.8%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minneapolis Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN

Zip Code % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 55454 9.8% 72.3% (-62.5)#1 64.8% (-55.0)#163
2. 55414 16.5% 72.3% (-55.9)#2 64.8% (-48.4)#288
3. 55404 17.2% 72.3% (-55.1)#3 64.8% (-47.6)#310
4. 55403 24.3% 72.3% (-48.1)#6 64.8% (-40.6)#514
5. 55408 24.7% 72.3% (-47.6)#7 64.8% (-40.1)#526
6. 55401 30.9% 72.3% (-41.4)#11 64.8% (-33.9)#814
7. 55415 34.8% 72.3% (-37.5)#13 64.8% (-30.0)#1,074
8. 55405 36.4% 72.3% (-36.0)#15 64.8% (-28.5)#1,195
9. 55413 38.7% 72.3% (-33.6)#17 64.8% (-26.1)#1,392
10. 55425 39.8% 72.3% (-32.6)#18 64.8% (-25.0)#1,480
11. 55435 44.8% 72.3% (-27.5)#26 64.8% (-20.0)#2,011
12. 55411 49.8% 72.3% (-22.5)#32 64.8% (-15.0)#2,753
13. 55416 50.7% 72.3% (-21.6)#34 64.8% (-14.1)#2,914
14. 55428 55.7% 72.3% (-16.7)#39 64.8% (-9.14)#3,944
15. 55429 56.5% 72.3% (-15.8)#41 64.8% (-8.33)#4,144
16. 55421 60.3% 72.3% (-12.0)#50 64.8% (-4.47)#5,212
17. 55407 60.5% 72.3% (-11.8)#52 64.8% (-4.31)#5,261
18. 55441 60.8% 72.3% (-11.5)#53 64.8% (-3.99)#5,361
19. 55423 61.8% 72.3% (-10.6)#57 64.8% (-3.06)#5,712
20. 55432 63.0% 72.3% (-9.28)#64 64.8% (-1.78)#6,202
21. 55418 63.1% 72.3% (-9.24)#65 64.8% (-1.73)#6,230
22. 55430 64.3% 72.3% (-8.00)#71 64.8% (-0.492)#6,740
23. 55426 64.8% 72.3% (-7.54)#73 64.8% (-0.035)#6,946
24. 55420 66.6% 72.3% (-5.77)#83 64.8% (+1.74)#7,789
25. 55406 66.8% 72.3% (-5.53)#84 64.8% (+1.98)#7,920
26. 55427 67.8% 72.3% (-4.55)#90 64.8% (+2.96)#8,423
27. 55433 67.9% 72.3% (-4.40)#92 64.8% (+3.10)#8,503
28. 55431 69.0% 72.3% (-3.30)#99 64.8% (+4.21)#9,147
29. 55437 69.1% 72.3% (-3.23)#102 64.8% (+4.28)#9,200
30. 55409 69.6% 72.3% (-2.71)#108 64.8% (+4.80)#9,505
31. 55412 71.7% 72.3% (-0.670)#123 64.8% (+6.84)#10,843
32. 55422 73.1% 72.3% (+0.732)#139 64.8% (+8.24)#11,840
33. 55443 74.2% 72.3% (+1.88)#150 64.8% (+9.39)#12,689
34. 55447 75.8% 72.3% (+3.52)#185 64.8% (+11.0)#14,096
35. 55436 76.2% 72.3% (+3.92)#197 64.8% (+11.4)#14,447
36. 55442 77.7% 72.3% (+5.38)#226 64.8% (+12.9)#15,779
37. 55445 78.2% 72.3% (+5.83)#244 64.8% (+13.3)#16,204
38. 55419 78.2% 72.3% (+5.89)#245 64.8% (+13.4)#16,250
39. 55438 79.5% 72.3% (+7.18)#284 64.8% (+14.7)#17,431
40. 55417 80.3% 72.3% (+8.00)#309 64.8% (+15.5)#18,216
41. 55410 82.0% 72.3% (+9.67)#358 64.8% (+17.2)#19,861
42. 55446 82.5% 72.3% (+10.2)#381 64.8% (+17.7)#20,339
43. 55434 82.6% 72.3% (+10.3)#390 64.8% (+17.8)#20,481
44. 55448 83.6% 72.3% (+11.3)#433 64.8% (+18.8)#21,426
45. 55449 87.6% 72.3% (+15.3)#592 64.8% (+22.8)#25,187
46. 55444 90.3% 72.3% (+17.9)#681 64.8% (+25.5)#27,193
47. 55439 91.0% 72.3% (+18.6)#698 64.8% (+26.1)#27,655
48. 55424 92.3% 72.3% (+20.0)#739 64.8% (+27.5)#28,465

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
9.8%
#4
16.5%
#5
17.2%
#6
24.3%
#7
24.7%
#8
30.9%
#9
34.8%
#10
36.4%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN?
55454 has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN with 9.8%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minneapolis, MN?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minneapolis is 48.1%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota is 72.3%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.