Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computer, Engineering & Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States

30.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 18349, Pennsylvania 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#1
2. 85927, Arizona 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#2
3. 34679, Florida 100.0% 5.2% (+94.8)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#3
4. 83424, Idaho 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#4
5. 63847, Missouri 100.0% 5.9% (+94.1)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#5
6. 10985, New York 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#6
7. 11973, New York 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#2 6.8% (+93.2)#7
8. 97903, Oregon 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#8
9. 73553, Oklahoma 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#9
10. 07881, New Jersey 100.0% 7.7% (+92.3)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#10
11. 66251, Kansas 100.0% 6.0% (+94.0)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#11
12. 87064, New Mexico 90.9% 6.7% (+84.2)#1 6.8% (+84.1)#12
13. 79918, Texas 80.0% 6.5% (+73.5)#1 6.8% (+73.2)#13
14. 76957, Texas 78.3% 6.5% (+71.8)#2 6.8% (+71.5)#14
15. 79369, Texas 77.4% 6.5% (+70.9)#3 6.8% (+70.7)#15
16. 97635, Oregon 72.2% 7.5% (+64.6)#2 6.8% (+65.4)#16
17. 93563, California 71.4% 8.0% (+63.5)#1 6.8% (+64.7)#17
18. 98562, Washington 70.5% 10.2% (+60.4)#1 6.8% (+63.7)#18
19. 73705, Oklahoma 65.4% 4.9% (+60.5)#2 6.8% (+58.6)#19
20. 96124, California 63.8% 8.0% (+55.8)#2 6.8% (+57.0)#20
21. 61552, Illinois 63.3% 6.4% (+56.9)#1 6.8% (+56.6)#21
22. 61478, Illinois 57.7% 6.4% (+51.3)#2 6.8% (+50.9)#22
23. 59081, Montana 56.9% 5.4% (+51.5)#1 6.8% (+50.1)#23
24. 95140, California 56.0% 8.0% (+48.0)#3 6.8% (+49.2)#24
25. 16727, Pennsylvania 55.6% 6.5% (+49.0)#2 6.8% (+48.8)#25
26. 20630, Maryland 54.8% 10.7% (+44.1)#1 6.8% (+48.1)#26
27. 28308, North Carolina 54.5% 6.5% (+48.0)#1 6.8% (+47.8)#27
28. 58074, North Dakota 54.3% 4.7% (+49.6)#1 6.8% (+47.5)#28
29. 95134, California 54.2% 8.0% (+46.2)#4 6.8% (+47.4)#29
30. 01066, Massachusetts 53.8% 9.8% (+44.0)#1 6.8% (+47.1)#30
31. 59211, Montana 53.2% 5.4% (+47.8)#2 6.8% (+46.5)#31
32. 36727, Alabama 53.2% 5.7% (+47.5)#1 6.8% (+46.4)#32
33. 77863, Texas 51.9% 6.5% (+45.4)#4 6.8% (+45.1)#33
34. 26656, West Virginia 51.9% 4.4% (+47.4)#1 6.8% (+45.1)#34
35. 92266, California 51.9% 8.0% (+43.9)#5 6.8% (+45.1)#35
36. 53031, Wisconsin 51.3% 6.4% (+44.9)#1 6.8% (+44.5)#36
37. 44671, Ohio 51.3% 6.1% (+45.2)#1 6.8% (+44.5)#37
38. 95417, California 50.7% 8.0% (+42.7)#6 6.8% (+43.9)#38
39. 91948, California 50.0% 8.0% (+42.0)#7 6.8% (+43.2)#39
40. 12495, New York 50.0% 5.8% (+44.2)#3 6.8% (+43.2)#40
41. 96040, California 50.0% 8.0% (+42.0)#8 6.8% (+43.2)#41
42. 04541, Maine 50.0% 5.5% (+44.5)#1 6.8% (+43.2)#42
43. 57421, South Dakota 50.0% 4.8% (+45.2)#1 6.8% (+43.2)#43
44. 98623, Washington 50.0% 10.2% (+39.8)#2 6.8% (+43.2)#44
45. 72099, Arkansas 49.2% 4.1% (+45.1)#1 6.8% (+42.5)#45
46. 99635, Alaska 49.1% 6.3% (+42.8)#1 6.8% (+42.3)#46
47. 13859, New York 49.1% 5.8% (+43.2)#4 6.8% (+42.3)#47
48. 26714, West Virginia 48.2% 4.4% (+43.8)#2 6.8% (+41.5)#48
49. 01718, Massachusetts 48.1% 9.8% (+38.2)#2 6.8% (+41.3)#49
50. 97737, Oregon 46.8% 7.5% (+39.2)#3 6.8% (+40.0)#50
51. 94576, California 46.7% 8.0% (+38.7)#9 6.8% (+39.9)#51
52. 84408, Utah 46.4% 7.7% (+38.7)#1 6.8% (+39.7)#52
53. 98345, Washington 46.0% 10.2% (+35.8)#3 6.8% (+39.2)#53
54. 79519, Texas 45.8% 6.5% (+39.3)#5 6.8% (+39.1)#54
55. 98421, Washington 45.5% 10.2% (+35.3)#4 6.8% (+38.7)#55
56. 10919, New York 44.7% 5.8% (+38.9)#5 6.8% (+37.9)#56
57. 12724, New York 44.2% 5.8% (+38.4)#6 6.8% (+37.4)#57
58. 94021, California 43.8% 8.0% (+35.9)#10 6.8% (+37.1)#58
59. 72201, Arkansas 43.7% 4.1% (+39.6)#2 6.8% (+36.9)#59
60. 94086, California 43.7% 8.0% (+35.7)#11 6.8% (+36.9)#60
61. 95493, California 43.5% 8.0% (+35.5)#12 6.8% (+36.7)#61
62. 80025, Colorado 42.9% 9.0% (+33.9)#1 6.8% (+36.1)#62
63. 69027, Nebraska 42.9% 5.7% (+37.1)#1 6.8% (+36.1)#63
64. 22732, Virginia 42.6% 9.8% (+32.7)#1 6.8% (+35.8)#64
65. 24957, West Virginia 42.2% 4.4% (+37.8)#3 6.8% (+35.5)#65
66. 46704, Indiana 42.1% 5.5% (+36.6)#1 6.8% (+35.3)#66
67. 28542, North Carolina 42.0% 6.5% (+35.5)#2 6.8% (+35.2)#67
68. 19490, Pennsylvania 41.7% 6.5% (+35.2)#3 6.8% (+35.0)#68
69. 95671, California 41.7% 8.0% (+33.7)#13 6.8% (+34.9)#69
70. 47522, Indiana 41.6% 5.5% (+36.1)#2 6.8% (+34.8)#70
71. 87547, New Mexico 41.6% 6.7% (+34.9)#2 6.8% (+34.8)#71
72. 64101, Missouri 41.5% 5.9% (+35.7)#2 6.8% (+34.8)#72
73. 95014, California 41.4% 8.0% (+33.4)#14 6.8% (+34.6)#73
74. 35443, Alabama 41.3% 5.7% (+35.6)#2 6.8% (+34.6)#74
75. 95224, California 41.3% 8.0% (+33.3)#15 6.8% (+34.5)#75
76. 99775, Alaska 41.0% 6.3% (+34.7)#2 6.8% (+34.2)#76
77. 41534, Kentucky 40.7% 4.6% (+36.1)#1 6.8% (+34.0)#77
78. 25047, West Virginia 40.7% 4.4% (+36.3)#4 6.8% (+34.0)#78
79. 83111, Wyoming 40.7% 4.7% (+36.0)#1 6.8% (+33.9)#79
80. 18921, Pennsylvania 40.4% 6.5% (+33.8)#4 6.8% (+33.6)#80
81. 87544, New Mexico 40.2% 6.7% (+33.6)#3 6.8% (+33.5)#81
82. 94085, California 40.1% 8.0% (+32.1)#16 6.8% (+33.3)#82
83. 95054, California 40.0% 8.0% (+32.1)#17 6.8% (+33.3)#83
84. 26838, West Virginia 40.0% 4.4% (+35.6)#5 6.8% (+33.2)#84
85. 01094, Massachusetts 40.0% 9.8% (+30.2)#3 6.8% (+33.2)#85
86. 94087, California 39.3% 8.0% (+31.4)#18 6.8% (+32.6)#86
87. 98052, Washington 39.0% 10.2% (+28.8)#5 6.8% (+32.2)#87
88. 92518, California 38.8% 8.0% (+30.8)#19 6.8% (+32.0)#88
89. 98007, Washington 38.7% 10.2% (+28.6)#6 6.8% (+31.9)#89
90. 13065, New York 38.6% 5.8% (+32.8)#7 6.8% (+31.9)#90
91. 22476, Virginia 38.5% 9.8% (+28.6)#2 6.8% (+31.7)#91
92. 88414, New Mexico 38.5% 6.7% (+31.8)#4 6.8% (+31.7)#92
93. 94539, California 38.4% 8.0% (+30.5)#20 6.8% (+31.7)#93
94. 94040, California 38.3% 8.0% (+30.4)#21 6.8% (+31.6)#94
95. 80024, Colorado 38.2% 9.0% (+29.2)#2 6.8% (+31.5)#95
96. 80453, Colorado 38.2% 9.0% (+29.2)#3 6.8% (+31.4)#96
97. 87049, New Mexico 38.2% 6.7% (+31.5)#5 6.8% (+31.4)#97
98. 99566, Alaska 38.1% 6.3% (+31.8)#3 6.8% (+31.3)#98
99. 18457, Pennsylvania 38.1% 6.5% (+31.6)#5 6.8% (+31.3)#99
100. 02142, Massachusetts 38.0% 9.8% (+28.1)#4 6.8% (+31.2)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
18349 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States is 6.8%.