Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Accommodation & Food Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States

40.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 00960, Puerto Rico 100.0% 8.2% (+91.8)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#1
2. 60141, Illinois 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#2
3. 34661, Florida 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#3
4. 32228, Florida 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#4
5. 14056, New York 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#5
6. 97028, Oregon 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#6
7. 24412, Virginia 100.0% 6.4% (+93.6)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#7
8. 34140, Florida 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#3 6.9% (+93.1)#8
9. 22538, Virginia 100.0% 6.4% (+93.6)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#9
10. 00694, Puerto Rico 100.0% 8.2% (+91.8)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#10
11. 12961, New York 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#11
12. 40803, Kentucky 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#12
13. 88354, New Mexico 100.0% 7.9% (+92.1)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#13
14. 13683, New York 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#3 6.9% (+93.1)#14
15. 32061, Florida 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#4 6.9% (+93.1)#15
16. 38132, Tennessee 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#16
17. 95981, California 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#17
18. 83463, Idaho 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#18
19. 12864, New York 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#4 6.9% (+93.1)#19
20. 85922, Arizona 95.1% 7.6% (+87.6)#1 6.9% (+88.2)#20
21. 96126, California 94.6% 7.2% (+87.4)#2 6.9% (+87.7)#21
22. 85309, Arizona 89.5% 7.6% (+81.9)#2 6.9% (+82.6)#22
23. 30539, Georgia 87.9% 7.2% (+80.7)#1 6.9% (+81.0)#23
24. 13696, New York 86.0% 6.2% (+79.8)#5 6.9% (+79.1)#24
25. 03890, New Hampshire 85.7% 6.3% (+79.4)#1 6.9% (+78.8)#25
26. 41663, Kentucky 82.9% 6.7% (+76.3)#2 6.9% (+76.0)#26
27. 26209, West Virginia 80.8% 7.1% (+73.7)#1 6.9% (+73.9)#27
28. 78879, Texas 80.6% 7.2% (+73.4)#1 6.9% (+73.7)#28
29. 44828, Ohio 79.6% 7.0% (+72.6)#1 6.9% (+72.7)#29
30. 26563, West Virginia 78.9% 7.1% (+71.9)#2 6.9% (+72.1)#30
31. 83278, Idaho 76.7% 7.1% (+69.6)#2 6.9% (+69.9)#31
32. 13834, New York 75.6% 6.2% (+69.4)#6 6.9% (+68.7)#32
33. 77376, Texas 73.0% 7.2% (+65.8)#2 6.9% (+66.1)#33
34. 92369, California 71.4% 7.2% (+64.3)#3 6.9% (+64.5)#34
35. 49942, Michigan 71.4% 7.1% (+64.3)#1 6.9% (+64.5)#35
36. 98940, Washington 71.4% 6.5% (+64.9)#1 6.9% (+64.5)#36
37. 83013, Wyoming 71.3% 7.8% (+63.5)#1 6.9% (+64.4)#37
38. 86436, Arizona 71.3% 7.6% (+63.7)#3 6.9% (+64.4)#38
39. 65618, Missouri 70.9% 6.6% (+64.4)#1 6.9% (+64.0)#39
40. 83466, Idaho 69.7% 7.1% (+62.6)#3 6.9% (+62.8)#40
41. 60208, Illinois 69.4% 6.5% (+63.0)#2 6.9% (+62.6)#41
42. 67055, Kansas 68.3% 6.2% (+62.1)#1 6.9% (+61.4)#42
43. 23909, Virginia 64.0% 6.4% (+57.5)#3 6.9% (+57.1)#43
44. 29225, South Carolina 63.4% 8.0% (+55.4)#1 6.9% (+56.5)#44
45. 89315, Nevada 62.9% 13.3% (+49.6)#1 6.9% (+56.0)#45
46. 13678, New York 62.7% 6.2% (+56.5)#7 6.9% (+55.8)#46
47. 93043, California 62.5% 7.2% (+55.3)#4 6.9% (+55.6)#47
48. 59856, Montana 62.5% 8.3% (+54.2)#1 6.9% (+55.6)#48
49. 65664, Missouri 62.5% 6.6% (+55.9)#2 6.9% (+55.6)#49
50. 64420, Missouri 61.5% 6.6% (+55.0)#3 6.9% (+54.7)#50
51. 47924, Indiana 61.4% 6.4% (+55.0)#1 6.9% (+54.5)#51
52. 06263, Connecticut 61.2% 5.6% (+55.6)#1 6.9% (+54.3)#52
53. 71279, Louisiana 61.0% 7.6% (+53.4)#1 6.9% (+54.1)#53
54. 05059, Vermont 60.0% 6.7% (+53.3)#1 6.9% (+53.1)#54
55. 93524, California 60.0% 7.2% (+52.8)#5 6.9% (+53.1)#55
56. 95486, California 59.3% 7.2% (+52.1)#6 6.9% (+52.4)#56
57. 95435, California 59.1% 7.2% (+51.9)#7 6.9% (+52.2)#57
58. 25826, West Virginia 58.8% 7.1% (+51.7)#3 6.9% (+51.9)#58
59. 87530, New Mexico 58.0% 7.9% (+50.1)#2 6.9% (+51.1)#59
60. 98278, Washington 57.9% 6.5% (+51.4)#2 6.9% (+51.0)#60
61. 85328, Arizona 57.9% 7.6% (+50.3)#4 6.9% (+51.0)#61
62. 25942, West Virginia 57.7% 7.1% (+50.6)#4 6.9% (+50.8)#62
63. 41621, Kentucky 57.1% 6.7% (+50.5)#3 6.9% (+50.3)#63
64. 18454, Pennsylvania 57.1% 5.9% (+51.3)#1 6.9% (+50.3)#64
65. 78142, Texas 57.1% 7.2% (+49.9)#3 6.9% (+50.3)#65
66. 96751, Hawaii 56.3% 13.0% (+43.3)#1 6.9% (+49.4)#66
67. 84023, Utah 55.7% 6.1% (+49.6)#1 6.9% (+48.9)#67
68. 47366, Indiana 55.6% 6.4% (+49.1)#2 6.9% (+48.7)#68
69. 89311, Nevada 55.4% 13.3% (+42.2)#2 6.9% (+48.5)#69
70. 93627, California 55.3% 7.2% (+48.2)#8 6.9% (+48.5)#70
71. 15462, Pennsylvania 55.0% 5.9% (+49.1)#2 6.9% (+48.1)#71
72. 25007, West Virginia 54.9% 7.1% (+47.9)#5 6.9% (+48.0)#72
73. 27695, North Carolina 54.6% 7.0% (+47.5)#1 6.9% (+47.7)#73
74. 46980, Indiana 54.2% 6.4% (+47.8)#3 6.9% (+47.4)#74
75. 65729, Missouri 53.7% 6.6% (+47.2)#4 6.9% (+46.9)#75
76. 42153, Kentucky 53.5% 6.7% (+46.8)#4 6.9% (+46.6)#76
77. 59484, Montana 53.3% 8.3% (+45.1)#2 6.9% (+46.5)#77
78. 15638, Pennsylvania 53.2% 5.9% (+47.3)#3 6.9% (+46.3)#78
79. 92309, California 52.9% 7.2% (+45.8)#9 6.9% (+46.1)#79
80. 59842, Montana 52.9% 8.3% (+44.7)#3 6.9% (+46.1)#80
81. 79842, Texas 52.6% 7.2% (+45.4)#4 6.9% (+45.7)#81
82. 51101, Iowa 52.4% 5.5% (+46.9)#1 6.9% (+45.5)#82
83. 84716, Utah 52.3% 6.1% (+46.2)#2 6.9% (+45.4)#83
84. 93452, California 52.0% 7.2% (+44.8)#10 6.9% (+45.1)#84
85. 98535, Washington 51.9% 6.5% (+45.4)#3 6.9% (+45.0)#85
86. 49884, Michigan 51.5% 7.1% (+44.4)#2 6.9% (+44.6)#86
87. 88255, New Mexico 51.4% 7.9% (+43.5)#3 6.9% (+44.5)#87
88. 71330, Louisiana 51.4% 7.6% (+43.7)#2 6.9% (+44.5)#88
89. 38723, Mississippi 51.2% 6.9% (+44.3)#1 6.9% (+44.3)#89
90. 59020, Montana 51.0% 8.3% (+42.8)#4 6.9% (+44.1)#90
91. 12874, New York 50.9% 6.2% (+44.8)#8 6.9% (+44.1)#91
92. 55796, Minnesota 50.8% 5.5% (+45.3)#1 6.9% (+44.0)#92
93. 77663, Texas 50.5% 7.2% (+43.3)#5 6.9% (+43.6)#93
94. 23461, Virginia 50.0% 6.4% (+43.6)#4 6.9% (+43.1)#94
95. 95543, California 50.0% 7.2% (+42.8)#11 6.9% (+43.1)#95
96. 30812, Georgia 50.0% 7.2% (+42.8)#2 6.9% (+43.1)#96
97. 25093, West Virginia 50.0% 7.1% (+42.9)#6 6.9% (+43.1)#97
98. 45636, Ohio 50.0% 7.0% (+43.0)#2 6.9% (+43.1)#98
99. 68382, Nebraska 50.0% 5.7% (+44.3)#1 6.9% (+43.1)#99
100. 98364, Washington 50.0% 6.5% (+43.5)#4 6.9% (+43.1)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States?
00960 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States is 6.9%.