Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States

50.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 37845, Tennessee 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#1
2. 97335, Oregon 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#2
3. 24604, Virginia 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#3
4. 86313, Arizona 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#4
5. 87028, New Mexico 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#5
6. 95910, California 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#6
7. 40939, Kentucky 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#8
8. 77961, Texas 100.0% 8.7% (+91.3)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#9
9. 25864, West Virginia 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#10
10. 05141, Vermont 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#11
11. 72165, Arkansas 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#12
12. 43972, Ohio 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#13
13. 58402, North Dakota 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#14
14. 35074, Alabama 100.0% 6.9% (+93.1)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#15
15. 26615, West Virginia 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#16
16. 95248, California 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#17
17. 95511, California 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#3 6.9% (+93.1)#18
18. 72340, Arkansas 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#19
19. 88040, New Mexico 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#20
20. 15348, Pennsylvania 100.0% 6.0% (+94.0)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#21
21. 67659, Kansas 100.0% 6.4% (+93.6)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#22
22. 26586, West Virginia 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#3 6.9% (+93.1)#23
23. 78564, Texas 100.0% 8.7% (+91.3)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#24
24. 71651, Arkansas 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#3 6.9% (+93.1)#25
25. 42163, Kentucky 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#26
26. 27340, North Carolina 100.0% 7.3% (+92.7)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#27
27. 71722, Arkansas 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#4 6.9% (+93.1)#28
28. 77617, Texas 100.0% 8.7% (+91.3)#3 6.9% (+93.1)#29
29. 32072, Florida 100.0% 8.2% (+91.8)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#30
30. 88055, New Mexico 100.0% 7.4% (+92.6)#3 6.9% (+93.1)#31
31. 65439, Missouri 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#32
32. 02672, Massachusetts 100.0% 6.0% (+94.0)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#33
33. 45119, Ohio 100.0% 5.8% (+94.2)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#34
34. 28108, North Carolina 100.0% 7.3% (+92.7)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#35
35. 31327, Georgia 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#36
36. 93633, California 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#4 6.9% (+93.1)#37
37. 40829, Kentucky 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#3 6.9% (+93.1)#38
38. 61433, Illinois 100.0% 5.5% (+94.5)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#39
39. 77986, Texas 100.0% 8.7% (+91.3)#4 6.9% (+93.1)#40
40. 72059, Arkansas 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#5 6.9% (+93.1)#41
41. 92364, California 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#5 6.9% (+93.1)#42
42. 38021, Tennessee 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#43
43. 65730, Missouri 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#44
44. 67150, Kansas 100.0% 6.4% (+93.6)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#45
45. 95480, California 100.0% 6.7% (+93.3)#6 6.9% (+93.1)#46
46. 83602, Idaho 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#47
47. 47865, Indiana 100.0% 6.4% (+93.6)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#48
48. 24411, Virginia 100.0% 6.5% (+93.5)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#49
49. 70782, Louisiana 87.5% 8.1% (+79.4)#1 6.9% (+80.6)#50
50. 27875, North Carolina 85.7% 7.3% (+78.4)#3 6.9% (+78.8)#51
51. 65766, Missouri 84.6% 6.8% (+77.9)#3 6.9% (+77.7)#52
52. 18912, Pennsylvania 84.4% 6.0% (+78.4)#2 6.9% (+77.6)#53
53. 30664, Georgia 83.3% 6.8% (+76.6)#2 6.9% (+76.5)#54
54. 83809, Idaho 81.3% 9.1% (+72.2)#2 6.9% (+74.4)#55
55. 79326, Texas 80.0% 8.7% (+71.3)#5 6.9% (+73.1)#56
56. 04764, Maine 80.0% 7.6% (+72.4)#1 6.9% (+73.1)#57
57. 80432, Colorado 79.1% 8.0% (+71.0)#1 6.9% (+72.2)#58
58. 63365, Missouri 78.6% 6.8% (+71.8)#4 6.9% (+71.7)#59
59. 48724, Michigan 78.5% 5.8% (+72.7)#1 6.9% (+71.6)#60
60. 24132, Virginia 77.8% 6.5% (+71.3)#3 6.9% (+70.9)#61
61. 83348, Idaho 77.8% 9.1% (+68.7)#3 6.9% (+70.9)#62
62. 38070, Tennessee 77.2% 6.8% (+70.4)#3 6.9% (+70.3)#63
63. 12812, New York 77.2% 5.8% (+71.4)#1 6.9% (+70.3)#64
64. 88126, New Mexico 75.0% 7.4% (+67.6)#4 6.9% (+68.1)#65
65. 35457, Alabama 74.5% 6.9% (+67.6)#2 6.9% (+67.6)#66
66. 77415, Texas 74.3% 8.7% (+65.6)#6 6.9% (+67.4)#67
67. 72180, Arkansas 73.3% 7.1% (+66.2)#6 6.9% (+66.5)#68
68. 95625, California 72.7% 6.7% (+66.0)#7 6.9% (+65.9)#69
69. 87061, New Mexico 71.6% 7.4% (+64.1)#5 6.9% (+64.7)#70
70. 14169, New York 71.2% 5.8% (+65.4)#2 6.9% (+64.3)#71
71. 82083, Wyoming 69.4% 8.9% (+60.6)#1 6.9% (+62.6)#72
72. 23486, Virginia 67.2% 6.5% (+60.6)#4 6.9% (+60.3)#73
73. 58205, North Dakota 66.7% 7.2% (+59.5)#2 6.9% (+59.8)#74
74. 59082, Montana 66.7% 8.6% (+58.1)#1 6.9% (+59.8)#75
75. 77661, Texas 66.3% 8.7% (+57.6)#7 6.9% (+59.4)#76
76. 78547, Texas 65.2% 8.7% (+56.5)#8 6.9% (+58.3)#77
77. 39356, Mississippi 64.8% 6.8% (+58.0)#1 6.9% (+57.9)#78
78. 26714, West Virginia 64.7% 6.5% (+58.2)#4 6.9% (+57.8)#79
79. 99653, Alaska 64.4% 6.8% (+57.6)#1 6.9% (+57.5)#80
80. 41132, Kentucky 64.3% 6.2% (+58.1)#4 6.9% (+57.4)#81
81. 36476, Alabama 63.6% 6.9% (+56.7)#3 6.9% (+56.8)#82
82. 81429, Colorado 63.4% 8.0% (+55.4)#2 6.9% (+56.5)#83
83. 05833, Vermont 62.5% 7.4% (+55.1)#2 6.9% (+55.6)#84
84. 88338, New Mexico 62.1% 7.4% (+54.7)#6 6.9% (+55.2)#85
85. 35745, Alabama 61.9% 6.9% (+55.0)#4 6.9% (+55.0)#86
86. 70575, Louisiana 61.9% 8.1% (+53.8)#2 6.9% (+55.0)#87
87. 18457, Pennsylvania 61.9% 6.0% (+55.9)#3 6.9% (+55.0)#88
88. 87524, New Mexico 61.8% 7.4% (+54.3)#7 6.9% (+54.9)#89
89. 87531, New Mexico 61.5% 7.4% (+54.1)#8 6.9% (+54.7)#90
90. 65657, Missouri 61.3% 6.8% (+54.5)#5 6.9% (+54.4)#91
91. 26435, West Virginia 61.1% 6.5% (+54.6)#5 6.9% (+54.2)#92
92. 10932, New York 60.5% 5.8% (+54.7)#3 6.9% (+53.6)#93
93. 25113, West Virginia 60.3% 6.5% (+53.8)#6 6.9% (+53.5)#94
94. 79231, Texas 60.0% 8.7% (+51.3)#9 6.9% (+53.1)#95
95. 57659, South Dakota 60.0% 7.1% (+52.9)#1 6.9% (+53.1)#96
96. 83848, Idaho 59.8% 9.1% (+50.8)#4 6.9% (+53.0)#97
97. 83438, Idaho 59.3% 9.1% (+50.2)#5 6.9% (+52.4)#98
98. 16220, Pennsylvania 58.1% 6.0% (+52.1)#4 6.9% (+51.2)#99
99. 46704, Indiana 57.9% 6.4% (+51.5)#2 6.9% (+51.0)#100
100. 18413, Pennsylvania 57.7% 6.0% (+51.7)#5 6.9% (+50.8)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
37845 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States is 6.9%.